Archive for the ‘Communications’ Category

Oh So Social!

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

In an online generation, where we communicate more through cyber space than a physical presence, social media is deemed invaluable now more than ever! For businesses to ignore the power of the addictive social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and MySpace, in this day and age would be simple business suicide.

Hung, drawn and quartered.

OK…So maybe not quite as dramatic as that, but the importance of having a strong online presence is vital. There is no other low-cost promotional platform that easily portrays a brand message and identity whilst driving traffic. The positives certainly outweigh the negatives. Each outlet is exposed to large volumes of people, they increase Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) and it only costs in time. So with little to lose there is potentially so much to gain if used correctly. Setting up these pages is easy and more importantly…free.

Simples.

To break it down even more, lets take ASOS as an example! With there 246,094 fans on Facebook , 37,186 followers on Twitter and  60,331 hits to their YouTube page, ASOS certainly have no problem with keeping their audience up to date with the latest trends, products, news and events. It is their platform, their voice. There is no easier way to communicate the identity of a brand…And it doesn’t only apply to fashion brands - companies varying from British Airways and Starbucks to Asteroid Watch all ‘tweet’ on a daily basis!!

ASOS of Facebook

http://www.clients.openingdoors.co.uk/asos_blog.jpg

ASOS on Twitter

http://www.clients.openingdoors.co.uk/asos.jpg

ASOS on YouTube

http://www.clients.openingdoors.co.uk/asosyoutube.jpg

ASOS Blog

http://www.clients.openingdoors.co.uk/asosblog.jpg

P.S. Opening Doors hopped on the social train. Check us out: —->

Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/search/?post_form_id=ab8c6bd28687eb1821a9fbd50907c627&q=&init=quick&ref=search_loaded#!/pages/Opening-Doors/321016776288?ref=ts

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Notaboutdoors

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/companies/975499

Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/opening_doors/

This Isn’t It

Friday, October 30th, 2009

I first came across this glaring Photoshop gaffe on the ‘Photoshop Disasters‘ blog a few months ago (if you haven’t spotted it yet, just look between Jacko’s legs).

I think the image was hastily comped together for the press, who were desperate for a snippet of the rehearsals Jackson had been going through prior to his untimely death. And in that kind of rushed situation you can overlook a tiny error like forgetting to complete a giant red letter ‘S’. The image was hardly going to be splashed across every media imaginable the world over for months on end now was it?

Step forward ‘This is It‘: the movie cash-in documenting the aforementioned rehearsals. And as part of the movie’s advertising, the above image has been splashed across every media imaginable the world over for months on end.

Not that it really matters. You could design the ads for ‘This Is It’ in MS Word and people would flock to the cinemas in their millions regardless. But still, it’s a pretty high profile mistake to make, and one that you can see in all its glory wherever you are, at least for two more weeks anyway.

Product Placement

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Ah, product placement: the branding exercise everyone loves to hate. Well, not everyone. Certainly there are those who feel it adds a veneer of reality to their favourite films, videogames and TV shows. After all, isn’t it more realistic for characters to take swigs from cans of Coke or Pepsi than some hastily made up faux brands? The problem is, the concept of subtle product placement isn’t something many advertisers (nor directors) tend to grasp. In fact, the phrase might as well be an oxymoron. Countless pieces of entertainment feature product placement that is so blatent, so forced that it actually destroys any semblance of reality and becomes one long advert for a handful of brands (usually repeat offenders). Instead of brands becoming associated with characters, the opposite occurs.

Here’s a list of the top seven (everyone does top tens) most unsubtle product placements ever:

7) Bad Boys 2

Not content with an entire scene devoted to a giant blue Pepsi truck passing by, this wise-cracking sequel tries to work product placement and celebrity endorsement together with cringeworthy results. The particular scene involves the two protagonists commandeering a new Cadillac at gunpoint, forcing the occupants to get out of the car. Of said occupants, one is Dan Marino, a famous former American football player, who was taking the car for a test drive (evidently the ‘kind of man who drives a Cadillac’). Anyway, as if we weren’t now aware of the giant plug, Will Smith proceeds to force the point further down our throats by telling us that ‘Dan Marino should definately buy this car’. Thanks Will.

6) Castaway

Despite being subjected to a five minute extolling of Fed Ex’s core values at the beginning of this film, I actually quite liked the product placement. It was realistic for a courier man to work for a big brand like Fed Ex, and there was even a certain amount of product displacement going on when Hanks’ Fed Ex plane crashes. And anyone who says that they weren’t moved by the friendship between man and volley ball is a liar. But then it all gets a bit too much in the film’s third act when Hanks returns home to a Fed Ex endorsed hero’s welcome. And the final scene, where Hanks delivers a package he was stranded with to its destination (and so emphasising Fed Ex’s reliability), is just silly. The fact that it’s delivered four years too late is never mentioned, of course.

5) Fantastic 4

In a hoarding-heavy scene outside a motorbike sporting arena, the ‘Human Torch’ character, in combusted mode, gets flung against a billboard for a Burger King Whopper and ignites the poster in the process. Flame-grilled burgers message heavily implied? check.

4) Casino Royale

‘Nice watch, Rolex?’

‘Omega’

‘Beautiful’

Then there’s the 60 second spot for a Mondeo and the notion that in Bond’s universe every electronics product is a Sony.

3) Any Transformers film

King of product placement Michael Bay must have salivated at the prospect of directing Transformers. The whole film comes pre-packaged with product placement. But for the sequel he took his love for placement to the next step with outright narcissism: a giant poster for his earlier film ‘Bad Boys 2′.

2) The Island

Michael Bay strikes again in this ‘Logan’s Run’ rip off. In a future set world we’re supposed to believe that people engage in holographic Xbox fighting tournaments (replete with dated logo) and use MSN phone booths.

1) I, Robot

This film was released in 2004. And when Will Smith isn’t telling everyone how great his 2004 Converse All Star shoes are while listening to the funky music blaring from his 2004 JVC sound system, he’s running around completely unfazed by Audi’s monopoly of the car industry.

Reading this will annoy you

Monday, October 19th, 2009

…That’s Verdana, Fraktur, Helvetica, Comic Sans, Gill Sans and Times New Roman. At least according to this article anyway.

The title of that article is a little misleading though as it gives you the impression that the appearances of the fonts are responsible for creating negative sentiment.

However, in the body of the article, the author points out that any anger is generally a consequence of history, politics, context and frequency of usage, or the esoteric protestations of pedantic designers - not any font’s particular look. Except for Comic Sans: that’s just universally terrible to the eye.

So Helvetica is maligned for its ubiquity and for apparently turning the design world into one, big soulless ball of homogeny. Meanwhile, Verdana is a wannabe, Times New Roman a product of theft and Fraktur the choice of the Nazis (’nuff said).

The case of Gill Sans is a murky, divisive one. The typefaces of Eric Gill are widely lauded, but the man himself was apparently an incestual, child molesting, dog botherer. To some that won’t matter, they don’t care about the man, only his work which, being a typeface, is largely disassociated from its creator nowadays (I imagine many people, myself included, were not aware of the history of Gill Sans). It’s a similar situation to that of Roman Polanski. The Hollywood director was found guilty of unlawful sex with a minor in the ’70s and is currently incarcerated in Switzerland awaiting extradition to the US. But his movies have been widely acclaimed, with Chinatown and The Pianist frequently appearing in ‘Best Films’ lists. However, there will be those who refuse to watch a Polanski film, and I’m sure there will be those who refuse to run copy in Gill Sans.

But personally, I have no problem using Gill Sans, Verdana or Helvetica as they’re all tools for producing attractive typography, and the majority of people viewing your ads/communications probably won’t be thinking ‘that typeface is too populist’ or ‘I’m aware that typeface has a twisted creator so I won’t read it’. I think when it comes to fonts, if it looks nice, elegant, contemporary, simple and wasn’t used by the Nazis or any other brutal, totalitarian regime then it’s ok. But it is nevertheless interesting to see the history behind these typefaces, and I’m sure there are a plethora of colourful stories associated with all the other famous fonts.

Disney World Resort Florida’s Ugly Twin

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Whimsical, fanciful, magical and fantastical: a few of the words you might associate with the hyper-real fairytale lands of Disney World. So it came as a bit of a surprise to me when I read that Disney World Resort Florida is looking for a UK town to twin with as part of a new publicity grabbing marketing campaign.

You see, this is the same UK in which an author wrote a book called ‘Crap Towns‘ and it became a bestseller. And when numerous townspeople complained that their town hadn’t made it onto the crap list, the author soon released a sequel called ‘Crap Towns II: The Nation Decides‘. So I think it’s safe to say that many UK townspeople wouldn’t use adjectives like ‘magical’ and ‘fanciful’ to describe their towns. But it’ll be interesting to see what the winning destination is. I imagine the judging panel will make their decision particularly carefully, and they will probably choose some quaint country town (complete with castle) with a lovely appearance and respectable middle class demographic. Because no matter how effusively a townsperson champions their town, I can’t see the sign “Welcome to Disney World Resort Florida - Twinned with Luton” ever appearing. Though I am now preparing to eat my words…

Speechbreaker

Friday, October 9th, 2009

This blog isn’t a place to air political views and opinions, but I couldn’t help posting something about the Liberal Democrats’ latest attempts to malign Labour and the Tories because, well, it’s hilarious. And besides, it’s a social media campaign, so it’s sort of relevant in a highly tenuous way. 

Said campaign is a website that allows you to mashup the speeches made by Brown and Cameron at their respective party conferences and upload them to Youtube, and it’s about the only good thing the Liberals have done since Lloyd George was Prime Minister. It’s silly and puerile but some humourous combinations can be made:

Coke Doppelgängers

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

There are a lot of people out there who are sceptical when it comes to social media marketing. Many are confused by the array of social media around, some don’t believe that social media can convert into hard sales, while others think it’s just a complete waste of time and no one will see your message (even though Facebook has +250 million users and Twitter is on course to achieve 18 million users). This animation pretty much captures the cynicism:

But arguably the point of social media is not to serve as an immediate sales platform. Instead, it’s a good way of interacting with your public and engaging them with the brand, its values and messages. And after a certain amount of time, this engagement can translate into sales. But companies need to be patient, social media isn’t like advertising; you need to think about what appeals to users of social media and how a brand can be worked into this.

Coke clearly believe in social media engagement and their latest campaign shows a decent grasp of the type of brand engagement strategies that work online. The fizzy drink manufacturer has created a Facebook app called ‘Facial Profiler,’ which scans an uploaded photograph of your face and attempts to find your doppelgänger by searching other uploaded images for someone whose facial characteristics closely resemble your own. Given that Coke has over 1.8 million fans on Facebook, there may be a lot of people engaging with the Coke brand through this idea (and passing it on), specifically Coke Zero and its selling point of tasting just like regular Coke. Have a look at it here:

The nature of the campaign is perfectly suited to social media and the type of content that appeals to its users. In other words, it immerses people in the brand without forcing it down their throats. The only cynical point I would make is whether a Facebook campaign such as this would work without a large existing following.

Sign here please

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

In this Chip & Pin world there are few opportunities to sign something with your autograph, unless you’re a celebrity. Personally I’m glad. Not because of the security benefits provided by technology, but because I hate my signature. It’s terrible. It resembles the splattered and limb strewn corpse of a Daddy longlegs after a sadistic five year old has flattened it against a wall with a magazine. I don’t know what I was thinking when I decided it was an acceptable distinguishing squiggle.

My choice of design also proved problematic whenever I was signing receipts, because I could never quite get it to match what was on the back of my debit card. And if I did try, I would have to write so slowwwwwwwwwwwwwwly that you would be forgiven for thinking I had just mugged someone and was attempting to forge their signature to buy goods. Either way, bank tellers, bar staff and shop assistants often looked at me with suspicious eyes.

If you think about it though, an autograph is the one bit of design that every single person who can read, write and maybe spell has produced. Billions of personal brand logos. And, unlike mine, most don’t resemble the polygraph chart results of a terrible liar. They can be creative, elegant, swooping, artistic and often say a lot about the person. 

These are some of the reasons why signatures are used in brand logos. Two of the most famous examples of this are undoubtedly Disney and Kellogg’s (they’re below, just in case you were not familiar with them, which is probably about 0.1% of the Earth’s population)

The story behind Kellogg’s logo is that Mr Kellogg purportedly signed every box of cereal that left the factory to guarantee its quality. It’s a similar case with Disney, who kept a stylised version of their eponymous creator’s signature to highlight that they remain true to his original values. Without these signature logos would either company be as well known the world over? Maybe not.

And in a future where technology is gradually eroding the tendency to use handwritten flourishes, will we ever see brand logos like this again? Will signatures become something of the past entirely; replaced by some digital identity that is imbued with the qualities an autograph once held? Probably not, no. People will always have signatures. Technology just means that people like me no longer need to draw dead insects when shopping.

‘This means something!’ No it doesn’t. It’s just mashed potato. Weirdo.

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

I had to study semiotics as part of an advertising module while I was at university. It’s something to do with signs and symbols and the way we understand them, and it’s full of quasi-scientific words like syntactic. So basically, it’s a load of nonsense spouted by academics who try to disguise how much nonsense it is by confusing other people with big words and verbiage. It also has little practical value in advertising.

But it is quite fascinating once you break through the near impenetrable shell of science babble. Essentially, it’s just about how signs are given meaning. So in a send up to semiotics (and because hump day is going slowly), I thought it would be a bit of fun to include some examples of what happens to the meaning of signs when they’re translated poorly (as in engrish.com) or when familiar signs are given a subversive edge.

Really it’s just a tenuous way for me to get some puerile toilet humour onto a blog that’s supposed to be about marketing and communications and make it seem relevant.